• lily33@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    All that talk about “safety guardrails” is essentially a call against open source - when models are open, people can always remove them. That’s the price of freedom. And we have seen time and time again how the benefits outweigh that price.

    • Chickenstalker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      AI is here to stay. Future historians will mark somewhere in the last 5 years as the dawn of the Age of AI. The fire has been lit and attempts to suppress it will fail unless you go full Butlerian Jihad.

    • rufus@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I’d say this borders somewhat on Technophobia. Mixed with people’s fear that they will lose their jobs to AI. I think it’s also heavily fueled by ignorance.

      And the bad thing: Big tech also pushes for that, so they will stay in control and are the only ones benefitting from AI. Everyone else will get a filtered or crippeled version that aligns with their corporate interests.

      And once AI takes off, these things will make the world and society even more undemocratic. (My oppinion) I don’t want the world to be governed by whatever algorithms and guardrails Meta, Google and OpenAI/Microsoft put in place for us.

      Arthur Mensch, Co-founder of Mistral AI about the topic And I agree: We also don’t regulate the programming language ‘C’ because you could use it for nefarious purposes.