And the original lie isn’t sociopathic? You seem to think the secondary lies are somehow more damaging to the man than the original lie is damaging to the woman
Edit: ain’t saying this is a healthy or nice response. But he dished out a malicious, cruel lie that would damage her reputation (b/c let’s be real, the people doing this are teens and the slut label does real, lasting damage to a girl’s reputation), so she’s dishing malicious, cruel lies to damage his reputation. It’s weird that you decided that her behavior is worse than his. They’re doing the same thing to each other, he just started it in an attempt to boost his own reputation, which makes him the bigger piece of shit.
Their first comment specifically called the woman the shittiest person in this scenario, that the woman’s lies were even more disgusting and depraved than the man’s lie, to which I strongly disagree. I never said they were condoning the man’s behavior (they did call the man a shitty person), I just questioned why they thought the woman was worse.
nah the guy spreading the rumor in the first place is the biggest piece of shit in this scenario, FAFO
Definitely, but telling lies in response is just sociopathic, which seems to jive with lots of folks online apparently.
Downvote away but this is in no way a healthy response. Once again, showcasing the toxicity of people on lemmy. This place is a shit hole
And the original lie isn’t sociopathic? You seem to think the secondary lies are somehow more damaging to the man than the original lie is damaging to the woman
Edit: ain’t saying this is a healthy or nice response. But he dished out a malicious, cruel lie that would damage her reputation (b/c let’s be real, the people doing this are teens and the slut label does real, lasting damage to a girl’s reputation), so she’s dishing malicious, cruel lies to damage his reputation. It’s weird that you decided that her behavior is worse than his. They’re doing the same thing to each other, he just started it in an attempt to boost his own reputation, which makes him the bigger piece of shit.
“X is bad” doesn’t mean “Y isn’t bad”.
Their first comment specifically called the woman the shittiest person in this scenario, that the woman’s lies were even more disgusting and depraved than the man’s lie, to which I strongly disagree. I never said they were condoning the man’s behavior (they did call the man a shitty person), I just questioned why they thought the woman was worse.
If you can’t handle the medicine, you best not be dispensing it.
You seem really concerned about the fee fees of some low value human, is this solidarity or something?
What about “It didn’t happen, but if it did, here’s how it would have gone down”