Jaromil@fed.dyne.orgM to Original Internet Tech & Culture@fed.dyne.org · 1 year agoI prefer to be the one who writes codefed.dyne.orgimagemessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up1137arrow-down18cross-posted to: programmerhumor
arrow-up1129arrow-down1imageI prefer to be the one who writes codefed.dyne.orgJaromil@fed.dyne.orgM to Original Internet Tech & Culture@fed.dyne.org · 1 year agomessage-square15fedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor
minus-squarenamelivia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 year agoI find it actually useful to write code you understand and you could have written yourself, you are just lazy to type. But I cannot imagine developing using ChatGPT without actually knowing what is in the output or what specifically ask for.
minus-squareTrickDacy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoI agree with exactly what you wrote, but I don’t consider it “lazy” to use tools to get work done faster/better.
minus-squarenamelivia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoAgree! I meant lazy in a lazy-smart way
minus-squareCrackhappy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoAgreed. Auto complete with IDEs both save time and help make camel casing everything properly easier.
I find it actually useful to write code you understand and you could have written yourself, you are just lazy to type.
But I cannot imagine developing using ChatGPT without actually knowing what is in the output or what specifically ask for.
I agree with exactly what you wrote, but I don’t consider it “lazy” to use tools to get work done faster/better.
Agree! I meant lazy in a lazy-smart way
Agreed. Auto complete with IDEs both save time and help make camel casing everything properly easier.