• cmbabul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Ohhhhh so ONLY Joe can beat Trump! That’s why he’s doing it everyone, no one else has any chance!

    This makes zero fucking sense outside of the incumbents advantage. The biggest talking points around the country to get ’moderates’ and ‘undecideds’ to vote for Trump, vote third party, or abstain from voting are almost completely centered on him personally and to a lesser extent the DNC. It also ignores the many 2020 voters who were “I can’t believe they’re going to make me vote for Joe Biden”, people which anecdotally is everyone I know irl that voted for him.

    If he had stepped aside and let another primary happen not only do we lose all that baggage(a good portion of which I will freely admit is horsehit and the remainder mostly also apply to Trump) and the candidates could use the primary to get the electorate excited about something new and different, which would be a big gain in the fight to stop fascism. I’m gonna vote for you again Joe, but this is a foolish take imo

        • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah, one of them had a hostage crisis plague his presidency, the next got spoiled into total oblivion by a billionaire with some charts, and the last killed over a million Americans by sowing plague misinformation because it made him look bad.

          A preponderance of extraordinary circumstances does not establish a trend worth placing bets on.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s a good thing Biden hasn’t had any major crises during his presidency or spoiler campaigns launched, so we can just pretend he’s not like the others.

            • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              10 months ago
              1. Biden’s been resolving crises handed to him by the last guy

              2. Cornell West and RFK ain’t Ross Perot

              3. it’s a good thing you’re smart enough to vote for Biden anyways instead of being a pissant who lets fascism win because he doesn’t like one old guy with an ice cream tooth right?

              • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Keep telling yourself everything’s going great man. Biden’s term has not been a time of slow and steady improvement for many people and not a lot of people are going to think it’s all just Trump’s fault.

      • cmbabul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Like I said that’s the only part I can understand, but just because something has been a trend doesn’t mean it will stay one or even that there won’t be exceptions. I see that side of it, but I’m still suspicious he can do it again

        • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s been more than 100 years since an incumbent didn’t run for a second term and their party maintained the presidency (excluding Calvin Coolidge who technically didn’t run two terms, but basically did). No one knows what would happen if he were not to run, but history has shown that it’ll probably lead to a Republican win. It’s easier to predict the outcome having the incumbent run, and probably against the same person last time. Not saying it’s the best decision, but it is the most logical one.

          • cmbabul@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            That’s pretty much what I’m getting at, I get all the logical reasons but like you said the logical call ain’t always the right one. It’s too late now to second guess but him saying this is a bad idea, it makes it seem like there was a different outcome but it was decided without the will of the people being considered. If he was super popular it would be a different story, but he ain’t

            • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              the logical call ain’t always the right one

              Except it is. They said it’s not always the best, which is true, but you can’t know in advance what the best choice is. Making illogical choices leads to worse outcomes on average. I really shouldn’t have to explain this.

            • MisterCreamyShits@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              10 months ago

              In my entire lifetime no president has ever been super popular. That’s just not a thing any longer.

                  • cmbabul@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    What? No ones waiting for a super popular one, I’m saying if he were in some hypothetical world actually super popular just blindly deciding to run him again would be unquestionable. That there haven’t been any popular presidents recently doesn’t take away from the concept of a president being popular. If anything that means that incumbents should start being reevaluated more

    • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well, in the end they will keep the status quo going, since they know people will vote for just about anyone that runs in the blue party.

      2016 Sanders vs. Hillary reminds me that people are willing to stay home or change party.

    • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Biden thought that Trump would be politically finished if he lost the 2020 election --and in a rational world he would’ve been-- but he underestimated both the cowardice of Republican leaders and the slavish devotion of Trump’s followers, as did many of us, myself included. That’s why he feels obligated to take the safe route instead of stepping down. If Trump was gone or otherwise not the existential threat that I and many others believe he is, I doubt very much that Biden would be running again.