• TootSweet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    178
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Jesus. QA is not a corner you should cut when it’s literally life and death.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      So uh… as someone who works in biotech and understands exactly what level of rigor is required before the FDA allows you to sell a medical device - a term that has specific legal definition, regulations, and restrictions, I’m a bit suspicious this could be fake. This sort of error would indicate a systemic error and abrogation of due diligence at at least 4 different levels, and would be an apocalyptically huge lawsuit.

      Edit: I stand corrected - lots of people are corroborating this whole thing. That’s kind of astounding, tbh.

      • xalo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not fake. I’m a type 1 diabetic on this version of Omnipod and have noticed this before as well as other issues. I also had the app refuse to let me close an innocuous error modal window to activate a pod while I was in another country.

        While I love the hardware, the software feels precisely like it has been outsourced to a team with no knowledge of what T1 is and whoever internally is greenlighting the changes isn’t properly testing.

        The newest officially supported phone is the S21.

        • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          If the user does not recognize the issue, this may lead to delivery of more insulin than intended

          I love their subtle attempt at shifting blame here.

      • yazirian@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        There is a video demo of the bug later on the thread.

        Some android devices have a combination .- key on the numeric input UI. This is a contentious enough design choice to have stackoverflow threads on it. That combo key style is what’s used by the device and version shown on the demo. It appears that the device is reading that combo key as - and discarding (or taking absolute value), and not as a leading decimal.

  • the_joeba@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    147
    ·
    7 months ago

    I quit Insulet (I was the principal software dev for Android on OP5) because management didn’t care about this kind of thing. I couldn’t stay in good confidence.

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      84
      ·
      7 months ago

      You should reach out to the dev in the post. Your experience is going to be very interesting to any lawyers he talks to.

  • chaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    A story from a type 1 diabetic:

    I had what we will call “an incident” where I took pretty close to this scale of extra insulin. I’m a much heavier insulin user but it varies greatly between people and the kind of person who is dosing fractions of a unit like 0.15 turning into 15 would be a massive problem. It took about an hour for me to get to the hospital and I seemed just fine at that point. I don’t know why because usually the type of insulin I use hits it’s peak within an hour for me. My only guess is that my body was overwhelmed and somehow delayed my reaction to it, which I’ve never seen before.

    I got into the ER and they were very casual about it. From my past experience in medicine I’m guessing they weren’t sure if it really happened and wanted to see how it played out. My blood sugar was somewhere around 100 when they first tested me. 5 minutes later it was in the 40s. At that point the nurse said “oh fuck!” and sprinted to grab D50 (basically a sugar infusion) from where they keep their meds. I have been a paramedic (not just an EMT) and I can count the number of times I’ve seen a nurse run on my fingers.

    They started an IV in both arms and were pumping sugar in to keep me alive. My memory gets kinda hazy after that. They kept checking my blood for potassium levels because burning through that much insulin + glucose uses it up and can stop your heart. Eventually they had to start a central line (like an IV but straight into your heart) in my neck to deliver insulin because they were worried all the sugar they were giving in both arms would burn my arm veins. I remember the feeling when they started it and used a probe to see if it was in the right place the “tickling” feeling literally in my heart. I ended up in the ICU on 1-to-1 with a nurse because they had to monitor me so closely. If I had been later to the ER by 10-15 minutes I wouldn’t be telling you this story. I also had the benefit of knowing what happened ahead of time, which you would not if your pump magically multiplied your dose by 100 and you didn’t notice.

    All this to say, this is pretty fucking serious.

    • Flyingostrich@endlesstalk.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Am a medic. Had a similar call, but dude ended up having a rare tumor on his pancreas called and insulinoma. They produce and hold a bunch of insulin and can occasionally rupture and flood your system with insulin. Ofcourse we didn’t Know he had one at the time.

      We had a non Diabetic PT that we found with a glucose that just read low. So 30< with our glucometers. Dumped 100 of d20 into him with absolutely no changes. Ended up infusing 4 more bags of d20 into him during transport. Got him up to like 80 and then watched him become unresponsive again 5 min later. Checked again and found it to be back to 40. He was in a room a few min later. Normally Im glad we don’t cary d50 anymore that shit was like using a sledge hammer to hammer in a tack nail. But this was the one time d20 wasn’t cutting it.

      Anyways, glad you are alive. Shit can be scary.

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    So if I understand it, a bug has been identified that’s potentially going to make diabetics OD on insulin and die.

    That’s fucked.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    This, right here, is why “professional” software “engineers” should be licensed.

    • hpca01@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 months ago

      Former healthcare to software engineer working on a master’s here. My colleagues who were licensed back in healthcare weren’t all of the same quality. They all made mistakes at one point or another, some pretty bad some minor. There’s no difference though, minor could just as well become major.

      The way they get around it in healthcare is by throwing more people at the problem. You have a physician who is good at pointing in the general direction of the problem and a solution, then you have all the auxiliary staff who will narrow down on the solution based on their field. But at any single point all of them could fuck up, or one of them could.

      Now that I’m a software engineer and I’ve written enough code to do stuff. I can confidently say that licensing will not solve this problem. Especially if there aren’t enough people involved. Which is probably what was missed in the beginning.

      Anyway long rant over.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Licensing isn’t about magically ensuring that the practitioner won’t make mistakes; it’s about holding the practitioner accountable for his mistakes, which in theory gives him more incentive to be more careful – or to change his practice’s workflows and systems so as to be better able to detect and correct mistakes.

        In fact, I would argue that the “throwing more people at the problem” phenomenon in healthcare is an example of that very thing. Do you think they’d keep staffing levels equally high without licensing? 'Cause I sure don’t.

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          So, what you say is let’s hold the lowest level accountable, the person who may don’t have any power over the fcked up decisions about the amount of developers, presence of QA, and timeline.

          No, licensing will not make “accountable” people magically incentivised enough to make no mistakes

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            A licensed Professional Engineer is exactly the opposite of the lowest level person. In fact, that’s part of the point: giving the experts the power to say “no” to unsafe/unethical management.

            • lad@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Ok, stated that way it makes more sense, thanks for the explanation

              Don’t think that kind of thing is going to happen, though

    • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 months ago

      Never gonna happen as long as the demand is so much higher than the supply.

      Perhaps it should be a requirement for certain things though, like the medical area.

  • FlickOfTheBean@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Christ Almighty this is the dystopian software future that my college computer science ethics professor was working so hard to delay.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The dystopian part is when they’ll require you to pay a subscription to give you proper insulin dosages.

    • FruitfullyYours@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      7 months ago

      It looks like the advisory/recall notice came out (depending on time zones) either before his posts or shortly thereafter.

      Looks like the company has jumped on this right away as they should.

      They have several non app solutions for bolus dosing. Looks like the app is new (iOS version isn’t even out yet) and they didn’t vet their consultants output adequately. Probably because this was some quick port that was outsourced and management didn’t pay attention because ‘requirements are the same’.

      Super important in med device development to have adequate internal oversight of developers to ensure requirements are properly rigorously tested. Especially in a class III device like this

      • eluvatar@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Scary that the device can be convinced to kill you. I don’t care how bad the app is, that shouldn’t be possible.

      • Spectrism@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s available in other regions as well.

        1. Select “Yes”, even if you aren’t from the US.
        2. Open the menu on the top right and select your region the bottom.
        3. Profit.

        Super simple and intuitive. /s

        • Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Don’t forget to have a VPN. I recommend Mullvad because they accept Monero which cannot be tracked down to every detail of its purchase & location (all the way down to IP address for Bitcoin the Snitchcoin).

    • °˖✧ ipha ✧˖°@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 months ago

      Wow, what a shit website. It just led to a neverending sequence of confirmation boxes untill I refreshed the page enough that it let me through.

  • Veneroso@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    7 months ago

    Thanks to Bush II, medical device manufacturers are immune to class action lawsuits!

    Yay Capitalism!

    My Dad had the leads on his pacemaker fail and caused his heart to be repeatedly and continuously shocked.

    Leads were replaced but guess who paid for that?

    It wasn’t the manufacturer!

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      If your dad managed to torture the CEO, do you think a jury would convict?

      Like honestly.

      • Veneroso@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        To be fair, prison treatment aside, the fact that the elderly don’t rob banks, confuses me greatly.

        Guaranteed housing, meals, and health care.

        Sure it’s prison, but what is an elder care home, but a prison. for the elderly?

        Certain states have better prisons.

        Use that social security check to travel to NY and not Texas or Florida.

  • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    As a diabetic, holy fucking shit! I’ve been on the fence about getting a pump because it’s just one more thing that can fail.

    • neeeeDanke@feddit.de
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I don’t think you should take that as a main/sole argument against using a pump, there are many other pump manufacturerers oit there. I fir example am very happy with ma Dana i. (Apperently unlike the Omnipod, which seems very odd to me tbh) it has some saftey functions built into the device itself, so even if the controling software on my phone fucks up and doesn’t respect it’s hard limits the pumps driver still will. Unlike Apps or any management software I imagine the driver to be quite simple and thus less prone to errors like that.

      • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Huh? The omnipod dash is another pump from the same company that also has an app. What’s the difference? They’re both susceptible to bugs.

        Yes it absolutely has something to do with the pump.

        • jose1324@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          No? Love the downvotes from people who don’t even know about this.

          It’s an error in the phone app for the omnipod 5. It does NOT happen in the management device of the omnipod 5 or any other omnipod.

          The omnipod dash system does NOT have a phone app that can control the pump, only one that can monitor the stats. The PDM for the dash or the omnipod 5 does NOT have this bug, it is only in the android phone app for the omnipod 5.

          So no. It’s not a pump / pod problem.

          You being scared is unwarranted and has nothing to do with pump systems in general.

          • Basil@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I mean, if their app is suspectable to a bug that could literally kill you, I would never trust anything from that company again. It’s excruciatingly important that they don’t fuck up, and they did

            • jose1324@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              I mean… i can guarantee someone manually inserting insulin has definitely made mistakes in their dosage. For sure.

              Their PDMs are fine and more seriously tested. I agree that you shouldn’t use the phone app, but that’s for most people because it’s early in dev (there isn’t even an iphone version yet) and their other stuff is way older.

          • lad@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            What does the phone app do and what’s it used for? I was under the impression that you input something you calculated on the phone, but it seems that’s a wrong impression. Could you elaborate a bit?

            • jose1324@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Onmipod Dash only has a phone app to look at what it’s doing. Control is with the PDM.

              Omnipod 5 has a phone app and a pdm that can control the pod. Only that phone app has this bug. Either you calculate it yourself and bolus or let the device make an approximation

  • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    7 months ago

    part of the reason why the pharmaceutical industry is pretty rough and requires several verifications, as it only takes one mistake to be a fatal one.

    • ringwraithfish@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      7 months ago

      Any time someone removed about government oversight and regulations, I think about cases just like this. In many cases we should WANT a large bureaucracy with plenty of checks and approvals overseeing things like this.

      • lad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Except the large bureaucracy must be honest in that case, otherwise it just starts exploiting lack of transparency to do nothing and get benefits for that

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 months ago

    “But why would you do those steps in that order?” - The programmers, probably.

    I’m wondering if the field where you input the insulin amount is the same as you input the carbs, as that’d easily explain the bug. Reuse of the same field without proper checks can easily lead to… “Funny” results. If the carbs and insulin fields are completely separate, then that’s some very weird math bug they’ve put in there, somehow.

  • 🍔🍔🍔@toast.ooo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    can anyone with more insight explain what checks and balances had to have failed for this to make it to the field? i understand that this is like obviously potentially lethal but i don’t really know how this kind of thing would normally be prevented.

    • LwL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Usually something in the testing process, or perhaps the testing process itself is lacking. For medical applications it should be pretty rigorous as the consequences if something slips through can be very bad.

      If this is a new feature, then every step of the process designed to make sure it works failed. Which those are precisely will depend on the project, it could mean that multiple devs and QA had a look and either missed it or didn’t think to test for it. Where I work the developer implementing a feature tests it, then 2 other developers review the code, one of them also tests it, then it goes to dedicated QA who will test it more in depth and also do regression tests (checking that existing functionality still works). The testing QA member also checks with another QA member about anything they may have missed in their test steps. But this can vary heavily, also depending on the general model of development cycle (agile or waterfall) etc - though I’m working on much less critical software, no ones going to get injured even if nothing works correctly.

      If the bug was introduced through an update to this or another feature, their regression tests might be lacking.

      It’s also possible (though imo extremely negligient for such an application) that they don’t have dedicated QA in the first place, and even don’t require their devs to test comprehensively in place of dedicated QA.

      Or, they found the bug, but management didn’t want to allocate the resources to fix it.

      Imo something like this slipping through shows negligience of some form, it’s impossible to guarantee bug-free software, but this is not some obscure, hard to reproduce error.