• Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      IMHO, the judge is handling him with kid gloves so that, when he’s sentenced, he will have fewer avenues for an appeal. Because he wasn’t locked up and was given small (for him) fines, he’ll have fewer opportunities to mount miscarriage of justice claims.

      Edit: sentenced, not convicted.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    appeals court lifts gag order

    Facepalm

    appeals court reinstates gag order

    Slow clap

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The one-sentence decision from a four-judge panel came two weeks after an individual appellate judge had put the order on hold while the appeals process played out.

    Engoron imposed the initial gag order Oct. 3 after Trump posted a derogatory comment about the judge’s law clerk to social media.

    The post, which included a baseless allegation about the clerk’s personal life, came the second day of the trial in New York Attorney General Letitia James’ lawsuit.

    The former president, now the front-runner for the Republican 2024 presidential nomination, contends the lawsuit is a political attack by James, a Democrat.

    Engoron later fined Trump $15,000 for violating the gag order and expanded it to include his lawyers after they questioned clerk Allison Greenfield’s prominent role on the bench, where she sits alongside the judge, exchanging notes and advising him during testimony.

    State lawyers had sought to tie Trump’s comments to an uptick in nasty calls and messages directed at the judge and law clerk.


    The original article contains 377 words, the summary contains 163 words. Saved 57%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • stolid_agnostic
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    The AP reports that the court made a one-line ruling, but didn’t quote it for some strange reason.

    • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Because it’s 1 “sentence” consisting of 3 paragraphs across 2 pages, and nearly entirely -speak gobblyremoved, summarized perfectly in the headline"gag order reinstated"

      The PDF is out there, I invite you to get any more information from it than what was conveyed by the article.

  • ugh@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m staying pessimistic about all of the legal cases surrounding Trump because I don’t want to get my hopes up, but this is a very good sign. I’m sure they’ll continue to let him violate it with a light slap on the wrist at most, but it’s a bold move.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    I wonder how much ketchup is on the wall at the John Barron residence. For even the most minor of wrist slaps.

    • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      It shouldn’t have needed to exist in the first place.

      If you or I pulled this behavior, we wouldn’t get gag orders. We’d be held in contempt and locked up.

      • DarkGamer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Indeed, a normal defendant would have been treated much differently. Then again, a normal defendant doesn’t have an army of enraged violent dipshits with a tenuous relationship with reality, eager and willing to end democracy on his behalf, supporting them. That’s why he gets treated with kid gloves.