• You999@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 months ago

    You are comparing different efficiencies. Solar panels are 15% to 20% efficient at converting light into energy. As far as I’m aware every Efuel being developed (and every hydrocarbon fuel for that matter) has a 0% efficiency at converting light into energy but if I am mistaken please do correct me.

    • PlatinumSf@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      In a completely technical sense the hydrocarbon fuel was at one time produced from light energy (dead plants) but that’s taking your point and being pedantic since the “efficiency” of the conversation is probably astronomically low when you account for the loses sustained by whatever lifeform died and became said hydrocarbons.

    • Hypx@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      11 months ago

      E-fuels are made from solar power. It is not anywhere near 0%. Also, clearly efficiency is not “the only metric that matters.”

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        No they are made from electricity, and that electricity is made by solar panels (sometimes).

        Any form of conversion means losing energy.

        • Hypx@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          BEVs require conversion steps too. Not to mention the cost and energy needed to build them in the first place. They are nearly as efficient as their advocates think.

          • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            An EV’s pollution is recovered after 25 000km compared to an ICE.

            This is including the battery and being completely powered by coal power plants.

            The conversion steps for any EV is much less then any other form of fuel, because all those fuels usually convert to electricity somewhere in the line.

            You just really like bringing up debunked arguments, do you?

            • Hypx@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              It’s too bad we’re not comparing BEVs to conventional ICE cars. The alternatives are even greener and don’t have a paypack period.

              Fuel cell cars literally are EVs. People like you are just regurgitating a lot of BEV propaganda. These arguments only work when the alternative is a conventional ICE car running on pure fossil fuels. Your understanding of transportation technology is basically trapped in the early 2000s. You think you know something, but in reality you’re 20 years out of date.