• SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    If the term “allistic” offends you: grow up, it’s a new word. Is learning a new word scary? Cis isn’t offensive. Allistic isn’t offensive. If you become insecure because a previously unnamed characteristic or condition or yours suddenly receives a name that doesn’t have implicit negative connotations, you should go work on whatever problem you have.

    • Rozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Exactly like the word ‘cis’ and transphobes, people that think ‘allistic’ is offensive probably use autistic as a slur.

    • KeriKitty (They(/It))@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Holy shit this thread is cruel. I scrolled for way too long and started thinking I was pages deep into some general-interest place on Reddit. Nope, it’s c/Autism. Kinda the last place I’d expect to be okay with piles of hateful NTs coming in to point and laugh and talk trash at us.

      Also, very agree regarding the terminology-whining. Kinda hard to believe every term non-minority sorts find out about gets screamed about, claiming it’s a slur. Equality feeling like oppression, I guess. Only “those people” get words; everyone else is just “normal.” Grr.

    • DriftinGrifter@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      J dont habe anything against the termb and ive never Seen anyone removed about it to me it seems like you are just looking for an argument

    • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      If the term “allistic” offends you: grow up, it’s a new word. Is learning a new word scary?

      I have no particular opinion on the term “allistic,” but what happened to the maxime that each group should get the final say on the terminology applied to that specific group?

      Now we’re saying to a specific group “hey, from now on we’ll call you all this new term and you all can just shut up and deal with it, because you don’t get a say?”

      Seems like contradicting messages.

      • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Allistics wouldn’t have come up with a term to categorize themselves, because they already see themselves as “the normal” that doesn’t need to be categorized. Save that, I’m not against them choosing a different word - but it would still be chosen by one or a few of them for an unchoosing vast majority.