• DillyDaily@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    But the value of gold still relies on a majority of apocalypse survivor’s collectively deciding that gold has value. We could just, not.

    Or why not bottle caps, shells, cool looking rocks, dry salt, sugar, nutmeg, pickles, …

    Cooper would hold more value than gold, as a metal that can be worked and given practical application with even primitive metallurgy skills. Or silver, with it’s antimicrobial properties would still be more valuable than gold.

    Unless we’re all surviving the apocalypse and still trying to make chips for iPhones, what good is gold?

    Gold is a middle man within a trade economy.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Gold is workable, conductive, and non oxidizing. It’s also used for jewelry. So yeah not great for survival but if you’re using copper, gold is similar or better except for its rarity or iron is available and much better

    • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It does rely on people deciding it has value. It’s not the people who are still mostly logical who would value gold the highest. That’s why I would expect a highly stressed, armed person hopped up on memories of apocalyptic ads to go “ooh, shiny” and instinctively shoot to get at the stockpile of gold.