You must log in or register to comment.
physics majors when they’re asked to apply their knowledge (they’ve never been outside of the lab)
They can design the chicken coop, but only for spherical chickens in a vacuum.
Built from ideal materials with zero tolerance
Just like the Tesla Truck!
Though lack of both physics and engineering is on display there.
It also fails from the arts and sociology perspectives.
deleted by creator
If you ask a scientist what pi is, they will tell you it equals 3.14159. If you ask a mathematician, they will tell you pi equals the circumference of a circle divided by its diameter. If you ask an engineer, they will say “about 3, but let’s round it up to 5 to be safe.”
I’d replace scientist to something more precise like physicist because usually people consider mathematicians as scientists even if it depends on definitions.
usually people consider mathematicians as scientists
Yikes!
… Wait, does this mean I can call a historian an artist? Then I’m game.
You can call them whatever you want, what are they going to do? They’re historians!
In twenty years time they’ll rip into me on r/askhistorians
Historians are scientists imo. Is that a reference I don’t have?
Usually (in my experience?) history is one of the ‘humanities’, which are more lumped with arts than sciences.
Yes it usually is, but I think the methodologies for modern history research is very much scientific.
Feel free! I actually just googled it because I couldn’t exactly remember it. I’d use contractions too and make it less formal sounding.
Thank you, I feel free now. Go get those other hostages now!
As someone with a degree in physics who ended up in an engineering role, I approve of this meme.
As an engineer, I don’t believe in any of that mind reading mumbo jumbo.
Astronomy is one of the many tools of the devil.
Fr, what can you do with a physics degree except teach people physics
Come up with new physics to teach people?
Applied physics is a thing. Lots of jobs there. Geophysics, biophysics, engineering physics (yes, that’s a thing…)
engineering physics (yes, that’s a thing…)
Architect?
So true, lol
Literally everything. All science and engineering is based on physics
I used my particle physics and knowledge of quantum topology to hybridise a new species of drought-resistant pineapple just the other day. It’s that easy!
Okay. Good luck having anything from modernity without physics then. Especially your plumbing.
Well, we did have plenty of engineered items before having the proper physics theory to explain what was happening. Physics does a whole lot more than simply enabling engineering to do more. It’s the basis of our understanding of the universe.
Oh, I do my plumbing based on political science. But that’s not especially modern. The real genius is using music theory to run my email server. I’m setting self-hosted jazz on a saxophone next weekend.
Removed by mod
What’s the first indicator a scientist tried to build their own experiment using the soldering station ?
The smell of burnt fingers.
What’s the scientist waiting for sitting in front of their own experiment ?
Waiting for the infinite loop they coded to finish after they claimed they didn’t need the engineer’s help to write the code in their experiment.
How many scientists do you need to change a light bulb ?
Theoretically just one, but it can take several until one of them can call an engineer and admit they only know how to change light bulbs theoretically.
What does a scientist call an electrolytic capacitor ?
Acid distribution subsystem.
Is the date a perfect sphere in a vacuum with no friction?
Aww, he doesn’t understand physics and has a small dick? :(
Her: “No I meant I’m a software engineer.”
Him: “Oh. I also hate myself and want to die.”
“Can I lick the science?”
“Nothing else has made the code work so ya might as well!”
Ask a
physicianphysicist to build a bridge, it collapse but he knows exactly how and why it collapsed.Ask an engineer to do it, it holds but he has no idea how it’s holding together.
Wow med school has really upped their game.
“Doctors Without Bridges”
Where we’re going we don’t need bridges
😎
I think the word you’re looking for is physicist. A physician is a medical doctor (as in a person that treats sick people). A physicist is a person that studies physics (as in a person that knows how to solve word problems involving pool tables).
It’s a classic French speaker mistake because physicist is “physicien” and physician is “médecin”, very different.
(And Russian)
Who said she’s a mechanical engineer?
She probably drives a train
IIRC they all learn some physics at engineering school. Even the software engineers.
deleted by creator
In my engineering school, the major difference between software engineers and real engineers is that software engineers don’t study physics.
I did chemical engineering because it only required two physics courses.
And because I like chemistry.
deleted by creator
Neither do the physicists
Isn’t physics a pretty integral part of engineering?
No, integrals are mathematics
Depends on the specific engineering branch. Sometimes more, sometimes less. Sometimes nothing at all. But all engineering branches share one thing with physics: math.
Engineering is just the economical application of applied physics, without Physicists Engineers work off faulty knowledge, without Engineers nothing gets designed.
The level of understanding an Engineer needs, however, is purely within the practical and economical, while Physicists understandably have more in-depth knowledge.
Engineering is more like accounting, but for objects instead of money. Tables, rule books, and lobbyists.
And writing reports, calculations and such…even manuals if there is time
Hey we understand plenty! Well the parts we have to to make the thing not go boom anyways…
Wait, things aren’t supposed to go boom ?
I’m Torgue and I’m here to ask you one question and one question only: Explosions?
Where’s the kaboom? There should have been an earth-shattering kaboom!
Excellent, excellent. One thought, though. Maybe it should be boom, boom, and then kaboom. Sort of a hoo-ah grand finale!
I suck at math too!
Don’t we all??
I’m sure you didn’t mean it, but given the dearth of women in engineering, there’s an interpretation of this meme that’s kinda sexist.
I’m literally a woman in STEM lmao.
Like I said, I don’t think you meant it.
Independent of who you are the meme could be read in a certain way.
- You could replace either character and the meme would still work. Sometimes, things are just a joke.
- I’m not responsible for bigots who misinterpret things based on their own biases.
- Woke scolding only divides people who should be allies instead of addressing those who are the problem (see 2).
“Woke scolding”
If you think this doesn’t exist then you haven’t spent enough time differentiating Marxism from liberal identity politics.
so glad you were here to explain to me the error of my ways, whatever would i do without your enlightened understanding of marxism🙄
if you think people complaining about “woke scolds” aren’t 99% conservatives then idk what to tell you dog, particularly in the context of “actually being concerned about social issues pushes people into reaction!”
- Yes you are! This is the internet! Stop being nice and start hating people!!
No! I refuse! Take my silly memes and have a good night, you beautiful bastard!
If 1) is true then taking a stand on 2) and 3) is pointless at best and callous at worst.
Like you said, the joke works equally well with the genders reversed to remove the possibility of misinterpretation.
I understand, however, I feel that the critique of this meme is an overreach and, frankly, misdirected. By focusing on this as a problem, we risk diverting attention from the real, substantive issues that need our energy and advocacy. It’s important to pick our battles wisely and concentrate on fighting blatant sexism and inequality, rather than reading into harmless humor. We do a disservice to the cause by attacking allies over perceived slights that, in reality, are neutral and unrelated to the broader struggles women face in STEM. Regardless of who is in this meme, it does not effect my position as a woman in STEM in any way.
I’m not trying to attack you or anything. I’m not calling you a sexist and throughout this whole interaction I’ve given you maximal benefit of the doubt about your intentions.
All I wanted to do is point out that this meme could be read to have an unintended negative meaning, a point which I don’t think you’ve even disagreed with.
If a big part of why this meme is okay to you is the fact that you’re a woman in STEM them at least men should be aware that it might be interpreted differently if they share it or spread it around. It is, after all, a meme.
That sounded darker when I misread your comment as
the death of women in engineering
