• sartalon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 year ago

    This sounds wildly implausible, or at least very exaggerated.

    I’ve worked on jets. If you put them in pieces, you are talking months (at least 3-6), to put them back together. Modern jets aren’t Legos. They are very complex machines that require testing and fine tuning.

    Most flight surface controls and engines parts have flight hour limits that are painstakingly logged so preventative maintenance maximizes service lifetime. When we transferred jets, we also delivered their maintenance history.

    When we mothball aircraft, we only remove certain components and basically seal it up. To take it out of mothball and reassemble it, under normal circumstances, you are talking 8 months.

    Maybe they surreptitiously transferred aircraft to Ukraine, I can believe that. But if they broke them down into individual parts and said, “Here you go!”, the proper response would be, “Go fuck yourself.”

    I imagine this story started out one way and has just been embellished each telling.

    • InfiniteStruggle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe they just rolled the jets there, took the hubcaps of the fuel inlet off of every one of them (so that they are “disassembled”) and then let ukraine know.

      So still technically correct and within international arms trade law, but the jets got through without needing too much reassembly.

      Maybe put some clingwrap or something over the inlet so moisture doesn’t get in.

      • avrachan@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        So still technically correct and within international arms trade law, but the jets got through without needing too much reassembly.

        that’s very interesting!!

        where can I learn international law regarding the transfer of military aircrafs?

  • kersploosh@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    And where did you get those unmarked crates of R-27’s?

    They fell off a truck. Now stop asking questions.

  • mkwt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    This reminds me of the beginning of lend lease. Where the us and Canada built a few air strips in the middle of nowhere that just happened to straddle the border.

    1. American factory pilot would fly brand new fighter plane and land carefully on the neutral American side of the runway and drive away.
    2. Somehow, the now abandoned salvage property would get towed to the other side
    3. British pilot in Dominion of Canada gets in and flies to United Kingdom.
    • AndyLikesCandy@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Came here for this. Need to find an island air strip where we store all the factory reject F35s to host some lost Ukrainian fishermen…

  • WoefKat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • AccmRazr@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s written in the Nitter link but Poland wanted the backing of the US in the event Russia would attack Poland. They wanted it to be an “Allied” decision as opposed to just a Polish decision.

    • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Same reason even major powers like Germany coordinate with the US when it comes to giving Ukraine weapons: the US is the only country in the world at the moment that is completely invincible, so having it share the responsibility is a good idea

        • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Defending and attacking are two different things. I meant the US cannot be defeated by an attacker.

          • avrachan@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            then Russia makes a better example of a invincible empire.

            Sweden, France, Germany have all tried at their peak strength to conquer Russia and failed.

            USA with its geographical isolation has been lucky in that regard.

                • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Russians aren’t more expendable than any other human being. They’re just being treated as such by their fascist regime. I know it’s easy to start thinking badly of all of them because of the idiotic war, but they’re human beings too. The ones outside of the kremlin at least.

                • b3nsn0w@pricefield.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  do you have an example of the russian federation getting attacked by a near-peer adversary without the now defunct soviet union defending it?