• Matt@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because they get an extra $200 per upgrade to a usable amount, while getting to advertise the lower price. And the low specs force early upgrades for the people who purchase the base model. As always, it’s about the money.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Exactly. I forget the term, but companies don’t want you to buy the absolute base, budget model. Same with cars. They want it that low to advertise the line, expecting most people to pay a few hundred *more for a vastly better product.

    • HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Aye, but they could lower the starting price, increase specs and ship larger volume for an overall larger profit, right?

      If I was running the company, I’d rather more people buy my product for a lower price than far fewer people buy my product for a somewhat higher price. Plus, higher sales figures itself is better, no? I don’t get the strategy. They’re leaving out the whole $2,000 that someone would have otherwise spent if the base model was actually useable.

    • V ‎ ‎ @beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think that was the tactic they are using. Enterprises and engineers are going to spec out the RAM and/or CPU, and anyone else will get it in the default config and possibly not even notice the difference. If you know, then you know sort of thing?