ElCanut@jlai.lu to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 1 年前Oh no ...jlai.luimagemessage-square318fedilinkarrow-up11.79Karrow-down1109
arrow-up11.69Karrow-down1imageOh no ...jlai.luElCanut@jlai.lu to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 1 年前message-square318fedilink
minus-squareBaut [she/her] auf.@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 年前X’ architecture is insecure. There’s no isolation between windows, and each process can spy on your input. That’s just one example. Wayland is necessary.
minus-squareExLisper@linux.communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 年前Yet no known active exploits use this insecure architecture to cause actual harm. It’s just another FUD.
minus-squareBaut [she/her] auf.@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前I’d hardly call that an exploit. There’s no protection.
X’ architecture is insecure. There’s no isolation between windows, and each process can spy on your input. That’s just one example.
Wayland is necessary.
Yet no known active exploits use this insecure architecture to cause actual harm. It’s just another FUD.
I’d hardly call that an exploit. There’s no protection.