• sqgl@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    While Signal did justify the need for numbers by cutting spam prevention I don’t get it…

    Spammers use fake phone numbers all the time on the regular phone service so why not on Signal? A few steps too many for them to bother registering?

    • sculd@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      A few possible answers:

      1. Signal is not big enough for spammers to spend resources on
      2. People who bothered to use Signal are likely to be more privacy minded and therefore less likely to fall for scam
      • u_tamtam@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago
        1. Signal just isn’t as private as its marketing wants you to think it is

        A tip (but you do you, of course), use something federated (XMPP!): the time for trusting a central organization to do no harm is over if you have kept tabs of anything internet over the last 40 years or so…

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Spammers use fake phone numbers all the time on the regular phone service

      The phone calls just use fake caller ID. Caller ID is entirely unauthenticated and the recipient just blindly trusts the sender, so scammers use sketchy VoIP services that let you override the caller ID without actually proving you own that number. Work is being done to improve this: https://www.fcc.gov/call-authentication

      That’s means it’s trivial to use a fake number for outgoing calls, but the spammers can’t actually receive incoming calls or texts to those numbers.