• rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      When you look at the material conditions in which Christianity took hold, it actually is pretty revolutionary. It’s a religion based on the rejection of wealth formed in the periphery of a decaying imperialist empire. I’m not religious, but those revolutionary ideas are based as fuck

      • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Im convinced of the exact opposite. I think that Christianity was a Roman psy-op that was designed to pacify a rebellious occupied Judea. Things that the new testament explicitly instructs worshippers to do include:

        Don’t seek material wealth or power, those who do so are evil.

        Remain meek and nonviolent, don’t seek liberation, and after you die you’ll get everything you would have wanted on earth and more.

        Pool your resources and take care of yourselves and each other, but still pay your taxes.

        When Roman soldiers attack you, don’t fight back.

      • SmoothIsFast@citizensgaming.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which is why those ideals were coopted by a religion and taken over by the Roman empire to manage and add authoritarian control by making it a God who said all this with their emperor being the only one able to appoint a pope who could clarify the messages in favor of how they wanted to rule.

        • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The overwhelming consensus among credentialed historians is that Jesus was a real person who did in fact live during and in the when and where described in the Bible.

          For some reason this consensus makes a lot of atheists angry. As an atheist myself, I’m not sure why. The fact that he’s almost certainly a real historical person doesn’t hurt my feelings at all and has no bearing whatsoever on the ways in which I arrive at my atheism.

          • Maeve@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve seen no compelling evidence of one historical figure called Jesus, nor a star. I’m willing to look at anything new you present.

            Imo, the veracity of an actual betting isn’t the point. It’s the essence of the teaching, as with Lao Tzi.

            • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Most evidence for historical figures from that long ago is from written accounts. It’s unsurprising that a person like Jesus wouldn’t have physical proof of his existence.