• Sovereign_13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    They…literally can, though? The primaries are not part of the election process outlined in the Constitution. They don’t have to have primaries at all.

    The DNC and RNC are not government entities, they’re private organizations.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The DNC and RNC are not government entities, they’re private organizations.

      Then why the fuck do they get privileged support from the state for their primaries?

      The answer is that the process is fucking corrupt, and they need to either actually be treated as the powerless private entities they claim to be (i.e. zero involvement in any elections whatsoever – primaries shouldn’t be a thing, and candidates on the general election ballot shouldn’t even have a party listed next to their name) or they need to be held accountable as the de-facto government entities they are.

      Or they need to be destroyed entirely outright; that’s fine too!

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      For fuck’s sake, even the Republicans can run a fair vote, nobody in the RNC wanted Trump but when they counted the votes, there it was. The DNC couldn’t run a vote properly if the UN sat at the polling stations and scrutinized the polls. The massive fuckery that occurred during her “coronation” was obvious and disgusting.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, they can eschew primaries and just appoint whatever candidate they want. But their voters might not like that.

      Not that Democrats have ever given a shit what their voters want.