• rustydrd@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the actual “mildly infuriating” part of this post for me. Criticizing YouTube for pushing subscriptions on its users is 100% justified, but posting rage-baity screenshots of low-quality websites without any sources or context is probably not the way to do that.

    • ChuckEffingNorris
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      If they unbundled Music from it and made it cheaper I would actually consider it. I don’t need the music, the family has Spotify.

      As it stands it is more expensive for my family than actual streaming services.

      • huginn@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        They’ve bundled music into it because music costs them a fraction as much as the video side while letting them charge 70% of a spotify subscription cost to make it a “good deal”

        Bundles are great if and only if you need and use everything in the bundle. Businesses love bundles because they know you won’t use it all.