• DaCookeyMonsta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the kind of person who would want to benefit the masses would be someone who wouldn’t seek power.

    Would be a fun experiment to just force temporary authority on people randomly.

    • enthusiasticamoeba
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      “The major problem—one of the major problems, for there are several—one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it; or rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them. To summarize: it is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it. To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.”

      -Douglas Adams, The Restaurant at the End of the Universe

    • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That was something I thought of years ago, and I was always curious how it would REALLY turn out.

      My idea was to fill Congress like jury duty. We just randomly select people for a three year term. (With 1/3 of Congress rotating out each year) It would pay enough that most people would make much more than they normally would, it should be like winning the lottery, and not like getting drafted.

      In theory, everybody should vote to improve their old life since they know they have to go back to it, but now I’m thinking about “We’ll have a cushy executive consulting position for you after your term if you vote against this bill…” So, there might be some more loopholes to tie up.