• Ser Salty@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The “funny” thing about the police shooting people for having guns is that it essentially means Americans don’t actually have the right to own/carry guns. They only have the right to buy them.

    • VinnieFarsheds@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Even if you don’t have a gun it’s a problem, if you are are stopped by police for a random check^1. You are asked for your license and registration papers. You move your hand 1 cm to get it, cop suddenly realizes you could theoretically have a gun, then decides to shoot you first because self defense.

      The possibility that literally everyone can have a firearm makes living there so much more dangerous compared to not having the option of shooting back whenever it would be needed for actual self defense.

      ^1 probability for random police checks has an inverse proportionality to the whiteness of one’s skin color.

    • aidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Police cannot shoot you (legally) for carrying, now whether they follow the law is a different matter

      • Ser Salty@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        They just claim they feared for their life and now they’re declared not guilty. There is no specific law saying they can just shoot you for having a gun, but there’s plenty of other laws, precedents etc. making it absolutely legal for them to shoot you for having a gun.

        • aidan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Of course, this is why body cams are one of the greatest innovations in policing.