• finkrat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Guy with shit circumstances decides to buy a gun and decides to go somewhere with the gun and decides to shoot undeserving people with the gun, it’s society’s fault”

    Way to blame the victim anon. No, this was his decision. I know folks who have life shitting all over them and it doesn’t make them want to kill children and families.

    • Serinus
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s both. Even terrible people with something to lose are less likely to throw it all away.

      If this guy makes $35k a year at dollar general, he probably doesn’t go on a murder spree.

      But you could also just not be an asshole. Why go after random people instead of someone who actually helps cause the bullshit?

      • specfreq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re right, we should be targeting the bourgeois, aristocrats and ultra rich with our killing sprees. What we need are eco terrorists, not senseless killings.

          • sock@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            the guy wants “good” terrorist he advocates while wiping the doritos off his desk and washing down his everclear with sugar free juice.

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Both apply. Yes, he ultimately chose to do it. However society shaped and funneled him into that position. It’s not a binary decision between individual and systematic, both can apply. In this case, social systems failed and put a large number of people in a bad situation with an apparent easy way out. Almost all then chose not to go on a killing spree. Unfortunately, “almost all” is “all”. Some will make the bad choice, when put in that position.

      As a society, we can’t change individual choices. What we can do however is change the framework those choices are made in. If we aim to put fewer people in that position, then fewer will make the wrong choice, and we will all be safer for it.

    • sock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      society isnt you or i society is the general way things are and yes society is the cause of shootings. mental health is a direct measure of society.

      society fights tooth and nail to have guns be super easy to get.

      society also fights tooth and nail to keep (mental) healthcare behind an impossible wall.

      so now we are generating mentally ill people that have easy access to guns. multiply that by the internal bias and bigotry you were raised with and many millions of potential offenders. boom you have a shooting every freaking day.

      yes the shooter is shitty and should be killed or in jail but society is at fault for the shooting even ever coming close to occuring.

    • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You only said that some people have a lower threshold.

      You guys are groomed in social=bad.