😂👍

  • Brokkr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, I’m not sure why all movies over 2 hours don’t have them, inserted by the theater so that they can sell more popcorn and candy.

    • CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      As someone with a bladder over 40 yrs old now (ugh), I think intermissions ought to be mandatory in anything over 2.5 hrs.

      If studios want cinema to survive (and at this point I’m not sure they do), they need to stop trying to cater exclusively to the 29-35 yr-old demo.

      My parents used to go to movies often. Now they find it a daunting chore because of the online reserved seating. So they just don’t go anymore. I don’t imagine they’re alone in that.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      2 hours seems normal to me, but I could definitely see it as you get closer to three.

      Hateful Eight had one and that was 2 hours 55 minutes.

      I bet the internet has a list of movies with intermissions:

      (looked, lots of lists, but not correlated with run times)

      Cleopatra was almost 4 damn hours!

      • CH3DD4R_G0B-L1N@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        And the Hateful 8 road show was the last great cinematic experience that comes to my mind. Coincidence? Probably since I just hate theaters now.

    • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      When I was a kid, I remember that Space Jam was the last movie with an intermission and the movie is not even that long.