• Aux@lemmy.world
    71·
    1 year ago

    Cellulose from wood is literally a dietary fibre. Just like that good healthy fibre you are getting from kale. Which is also mostly cellulose. There’s no difference for your body between kale and saw dust.

    • Bgugi@lemmy.world
      9·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think it’s fair to say kale and cellulose are basically the same.

      I’d much rather eat cellulose.

    • htrayl@lemmy.world
      31·
      1 year ago

      Yup, actually cellulose in food is not a problem at all in my mind, and is probably actually improving the average Americans health if anything.

    • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
      1·
      1 year ago

      Well there is right? Kale has other macro and micro nutrients, unlike you’re referring to the Fibre part only, then there would be no different right?

    • kase@lemmy.world
      1·
      1 year ago

      There’s no difference for your body between kale and saw dust.

      Be careful now, say something like that and someone might start a weird fad diet

    • bane_killgrindEnglish
      13·
      1 year ago

      What? Does sawdust have high levels of vitamins A, B6, C, K, folate, fiber, carotenoids and manganese? The last time i checked it doesn’t.

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        2·
        1 year ago

        We’re talking about fibre here. If anything, pure cellulose is better than kale.