• AssortedBiscuits [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is how you get “socialism is when the government does stuff.” Descriptivism is just a way of determining what a word means. It has no say in what a word ought to mean.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I agree that there should be a boundary between “words can only mean this one thing forever” and “don’t tell me what to doooooooooo I am now literally a PhD and MD in literal linguistics because I literally decided that I am and you literally can’t tell me what literal words mean, also socialism is literally when the government does stuff.”

    • kot [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I mean, groups of people can deliberately the meaning of words or other parts of language. Socialism coming to mean things that have no relation to marxism was probably a deliberate campaign. That’s also what the neutral language movement is about. But also linguistic derivation is just a fact of life, as described by sociolinguistics. And being mad that gay doesn’t mean happy anymore or that a certain word should always mean the same thing just makes you pedantic weirdo, if it’s not attached to a cause that actually matters.