Image transcription: a section of a Wikipedia article titled “Relationship with Reality”. It reads “From a scientific viewpoint, elves are not considered objectively real. [3] However,” End transcription.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      11 months ago

      Wow, they really dance around that. The belief in elves is real, champ, not the elves themselves due to that belief. This isn’t a Terry Pratchett novel.

      • dreadgoat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s written that way to be as neutral as possible.

        Replace “Elf” with “God” and you’ll see how important it is to “dance”

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            11 months ago

            What a thing to say. It’s perfectly reasonable to say that there’s insufficient evidence to believe in any gods, but to state that there is no god as a matter of fact is as presumptive as saying that there objectively is.

            • idiomaddict@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              I love how nobody is responding to you, because the truth is: we can’t know, but most of us are very sure whether there is a god either way. It’s nonsense to call what an atheist believes absolutely “true,” because we can’t know. I’m an atheist, but it’s just pseudoscience to suggest that we can scientifically prove that there’s no god.

              • Nash42@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                Agreed and well-put. Lack of evidence cannot give creedence to a claim. It’s all well and good to believe in (the absence of, or possibility of) supernatural being(s), but to state such beliefs as objective is not follow the scientific method.

              • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                11 months ago

                Where enough people have believed in the reality of elves that those beliefs then had real effects in the world, they can be understood as part of people’s worldview, and as a social reality: a thing which, like the exchange value of a dollar bill or the sense of pride stirred up by a national flag, is real because of people’s beliefs rather than as an objective reality. Accordingly, beliefs about elves and their social functions have varied over time and space.

                There are a few crusades and jihads that point towards gods being just as meaningfully real to us as dollar values and national pride

                • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Again, that’s actions taken by people based on beliefs, not actions taken by that in which they believe.