• ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Even if text to image generators are able to improve to be better than human artists, people won’t stop making art just because a computer can do it faster.

    • Khotetsu@lib.lgbt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      But they will stop hiring artists, and that’s more to the point of what they were saying. We’re already seeing some jobs being replaced with algorithms (mostly stuff like shitty click bait journalism, but still), and art has long been considered a skill not worth paying for. In centuries past, art used to be something only the rich could afford. Now, people get upset if artists charge $60 for a commission.

      The algorithms won’t need to produce work better than we can, or even equal. It just needs to make stuff that seems value appropriate. People have already made algorithms to imitate certain popular artists’ styles, and they’ve seen a hit to their income as a result. Why get a commission done from one of them when you can go online and get 50 for free that are kinda close, and then just pick the one you like.

      • ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        People have been getting automated out of their jobs for well over a century. Technology shouldn’t stop advancing; everyone should be compensated for the human labor saved through the use of automation.