Leaks confirm low takeup for Windows 11::Time to rethink Windows 10 support cycle then?

  • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    My theory is that after 98 windows started to follow the “this one shit, next one good” pattern. ME was shit, XP was great, Vista was shit, 7 was great, 8 was shit, 10 is good. Obviously 11 is shit and if the pattern holds the next one will be good again.

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The issue with that theory is that the “good” keep getting worse and the “shits” plumb the depths more and more with each cycle.

      They look good when comparing it with the last one but I would say ME (I used ME as a teen I know it) was better then Vista and Vista was better then 8 and 8 was better then 11.

    • noevidenz@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Microsoft decided to skip Windows 9 because, after doing a lot of research, they found that a lot of commonly used legacy software had implemented compatibility hacks which involved checking for “Windows 9” to detect when the software was running under either Windows 95 or Windows 98.

      Instead of breaking a lot of software or requiring a lot of updates (some of which could even be from vendors who were no longer in business) they decided to work around the problem by just skipping straight to 10.

      Edit: My mistake, I responded to the wrong comment. But I’m gonna leave it here because I already typed it.

      • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Version check on Windows 9x was done by comparing with the number 4, which was the internal version number, not with the marketing name.