• stolid_agnostic
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    If it isn’t falsifiable then it’s not science, period.

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Which is why QM interpretations are considered to be part of Physics philosophy as you can see the link to the weighty writeup on the Copenhagen Interpretation is part of Stanford’s Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

      But all interpretations are part of philosophy and are currently not falsifiable. Not just the ones someone may not like.

    • kakes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      And just because it’s not science doesn’t necessarily mean it can’t be right. No harm in exploring ideas.