Disney is raking its customers over the coals with a 75% price hike for their annual subscription (originally $80.) People wonder why piracy is on the rise.Multiple commenters are saying I'm off base about the 75% price increase. My payment less than a year ago was $79.99. Here's the proof.

  • daed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m sure it’s cheaper to maintain overall too, not including the one-time costs of hardware. Plus as you said, control is very valuable - and you get privacy, too! Nobody selling your usage data.

    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      TBH, it would depend on how many services I’m theoretically replacing, and whether you count the people I’ve shared my library with. Before I went down the rabbit hole, cost was the motivation, but I’m long past that.

      Between the usenet subs, paid search engines, power for a 24 bay server running 24x7, and adding a new drive every few months, I can’t really defend it on a cost basis for my own use (though that’s not to say it can’t be done considerably cheaper).

      Similarly, I’m giving my data to a handful of usenet search engines and 2 usenet providers my data (though I trust all of them more than the likes of Disney and Netflix)

      With all that said, I’ve never looked back. It’s a hobby project for me, I have total control, can help out my friends and family, and use the server for other stuff like private cloud hosting, home automation, network ad-blocking, etc…

      • daed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yep, looking at doing the exact same thing myself, albeit smaller scale to start with. I’m glad to hear you’re enjoying the ride despite the cost, because I know I’m headed down the same path, lol. Cheers.

        • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Welcome to the fun!

          If you need any guidance from this idiot, feel free to reach out.

          The best general advice I can give is if you want something reasonably large and flexible is to start with Unraid from the outset - I mucked around with a good number of alternatives, with all the hassle that involves before finding this straightforward, super-flexible solution. Otherwise, maybe look at a synology-type appliance for something smaller-scale and less versatile.

          • daed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Thanks! If I can be candid, I almost asked for your best piece of advice in my previous comment, so I appreciate it. I’ve heard great things about both - Synology especially people always seem to have good things to say. Still doing the research and deciding the best hardware path for the use case at the moment, so I’ll be sure to keep you in mind and pick your brain sometime!

            • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              No worries!

              The upside of synology (and I say this without having used them) is simplicity, and low power usage at the cost of flexibility.

              On unraid, I can toss in extra drives when I like (or remove them with slightly more hassle), and spin far more up, including VMs.

              Feel free to check in whenever though.