• Nobsi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    “we need more people that we dont respect to do the jobs that we dont want to. At the same time we have to make it really hard for immigrants to live here”

    • taladar@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, we are going to complain that asylum seekers don’t work while explicitly prohibiting work for asylum seekers.

      • agrammatic@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s one of the most blatant self-made problems around migration that populists very disingenuously employ to paint their favourite picture of the “welfare queen” which has been a bold, racist lie since it was first used.

        But I’m also a bit sceptical of how you can do this in a country without mandatory collective agreements in all sectors. Germany at least has a minimum wage, but that just means wage dumping can only go as low as 12 Euro per hour. Back in Cyprus, where the same question is constantly in the news, the most notorious anti-worker industry, the tourism sector, is begging for asylum seekers to be allowed in the jobs that they have most trouble filling with citizens, EU-residents, and work-permit holders. But they want to do so outside a collective agreement (one used to exist, but for various reasons is now dead-letter) and essentially without even the protection of a minimum wage (which Cyprus didn’t have until this year, and now it has an idiotic version of it which defines a monthly minimum wage without a limit to hours worked).

        I think that the introduction of asylum seekers in the workforce should happen, but it should happen in tandem with a massive pro-union legislation change that will make collective agreements mandatory across the board (similar to the Swedish and Finnish models, as far as I understand those). That might require re-aligning the way unionism is understood in Germany from per-workplace to be per-industry.

        • CAVOK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Can’t speak for Finland, although I think it’s the same, but collective agreements are certainly not mandatory in Sweden. Most companies over a certain size have them, but they don’t have to. Many, if not most, small businesses don’t.

          I personally wouldn’t work for a company that didn’t have one.

        • taladar@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          unionism

          Not sure this is quite the right term here. At least in the UK this is about being for the Union of the countries making up the UK, not about worker’s unions and in Northern Ireland it is usually synonymous with one side of the conflict.

          • agrammatic@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Given that the article is not about the UK, I don’t see a good reason to reach for a UK-specific definition.

          • thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Bollocks. Even in the UK unionism has dual meanings, one about organised labour and one about the country. And the country meaning of unionist only gets mindshare in NI & Scotland. If you mention anything about unions/unionism in England people will assume organised labour.

      • Nobsi@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The US doesn’t have a problem with finding good Immigrants. Even though the politics are horrible and misogynistic and you have to leave everything behind, smart people are moving to the US in droves. The greencard is still something desirable.
        Meanwhile in Germany you earn noticably less, spend noticably more the people are noticably less nice and you have to do as much work for your ID here as you do in the US.

  • k110111@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As someone who is a highly skilled immigrant, I have been looking for a job for 3 months, my friends (all of them) have been looking for jobs for the last 6 months. Germany needs to fix this issue first before asking for more immigrants. More people won’t fix anything if finding a job is so difficult.

    • ErwinLottemann@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      aren’t you supposed to take all of our jobs?! /s

      i hope you succeed soon. a friend of mine is also looking for a new job for nearly a year now 😐

      • k110111@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right now i just want a livable job, like i got 1k eur as a student for working 20h/week so right now anything above or equal should do. My only requirement is that it is related to software cuz thats my field.

        Man it is so crazy, i have masters from a uni which is 5th for computer science in germany. My gpa is 1.7 and i have 1.5 years of full time software dev experience and 3 years of part time (20h/week) software/ML engineering experience. And i have sent 70-80 applications and yet no interview. Like people if my creds are not enough to get me even 1 interview where i can show that i have skills that i claim to have then what will??

  • PugJesus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Immigrants bad!”

    economy needs more workers

    “Immigrants good!”

    jk, this won’t change opinions a bit.

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think a better solution would be to fund pensions out of a sovereign wealth fund that’s not necessarily tied to youth productivity.

    Stops youngins from feeling like they’re living in a geroncleptocracy, while also not tossing grandma out to live in the underpass

    • frostbiker@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What if we created one pension fund each year? Every person born that year contributes into that fund during their working years and withdraw from it in retirement. It seems like a solution that is fair to everybody, avoiding inter-generational wealth transfers.

        • KmlSlmk64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think that funds are kept in money. IIRC They are mostly kept in other means, so that they are at least somewhat sustainable against inflation. But that doesn’t mean that the above idea is good, or doesn’t have other flaws.

          • Spzi@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            But that doesn’t mean that the above idea is good, or doesn’t have other flaws.

            If you have more thoughts on this, could you spell them out?

            • KmlSlmk64@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean, you generally don’t want to tie up a lot of money, each year by year, meaning that you would have a lot of frozen capital. And capitalism (which also has some flaws, but right now we are using this system) depends on the flow of money/capital. Also managing these funds would make a lot of work / administration, because someone would have to manage what goes in and out and also in what form the funds to store in. And at the point of storing money from younger people, that is not being spent, whilst using money from older people, why not just have less money stored and use the money from the younger generation for the older ones. And you go full circle to the idea that we wanted to solve. Each system has its benefits and flaws, some of which are greater, which outweigh other, smaller ones. Sometimes the solution can be something completely different.

        • frostbiker@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why would you assume that the fund would be kept in cash? That’s not how pension funds work.

          • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because otherwise you run into the problem of having to get additional revenue from somewhere else.

            The current problem is that there aren’t enough young people working well paying enough jobs to fund pensions, because if they aren’t funding them it’s just an account you throw money into and then draw out of later.

            You can either provide an alternative source of additional funds or tell grandma it’s not your fault she put her money into a box instead of an investment vehicle to fund her retirement.

            • frostbiker@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I have described a system that would have prevented the problem in the first place while still providing the actuarial benefits of pooling resources.

              I am not offering a solution for how to transition from the current system where the young pay for the old.

              What I don’t like is the hyper-neoliberal approach where each person lives in an island and resources aren’t pooled at all, because it benefits the rich at the cost of the poor.

              • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s still losing money though, unless each cohort is able to operate it as an investment vehicle it’s no different than a generational shoebox in terms of what the money is doing while you’re waiting to pull out of it.

                The point of a pension fund is for the ongoing contributions of currently working folks to bring in enough new capital that people withdrawing don’t feel the effects of their contributions from 40 years ago having lost value against inflation.

                • frostbiker@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  The point of a pension fund is for the ongoing contributions of currently working folks to bring in enough new capital that people withdrawing don’t feel the effects of their contributions from 40 years ago having lost value against inflation.

                  No, that is not how long term investments work. Try reading about the subject and improve your own finances along the way. Investments typically grow faster than inflation, so the longer the original investment was made, the more money you have today.

  • Mopswasser@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    If Germany had an influx of highly qualified workers and professionals I guarantee you there wouldn’t be as much discussion. Immigration comes in different types.

      • Mopswasser@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Might be but letting people incompatible with our shared values in has always been a bad idea, especially when you let them stay indefinitely.

        • Don_alForno@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          letting people incompatible with our shared values in has always been a bad idea,

          Agreed, we shouldn’t have let Poland and Hungary join.

          • Mopswasser@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Haven’t seen them burn flags and smash public property in my town though, lately.

              • Mopswasser@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Who cares what a bunch of clowns did a couple of years ago in their own country? Not my problem.

                But very telling that you had to dig deep.

                I care about what happens in and around my home.

                • geissi@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  you had to dig deep

                  A ten second internet search. Yes I’m super invested in this.

                  I care about what happens in and around my home.

                  Well by that criterion, nobody has ever burned a flag or smashed public property near my home, so everything is peachy.

            • Don_alForno@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I also haven’t seen refugees do that in mine.

              Poland and Hungary though, they just burn EU subsidies by funneling them into the pockets of the Prime Minister’s family and friends and smash any attempt at civilizational progress or a fair treatment and distribution of refugees across the Union.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I mean, Germany is getting those too, but there are only going to be so many of those on the market. You aren’t gonna go to, I dunno, Sudan and find a town fully populated by people with doctorates hell-bent on leaving.