China’s foreign minister said Saturday that Israel has gone too far in responding to last week’s invasion by Hamas, China’s official news agency reported.

Speaking to Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said Israel’s actions have extended beyond self-defense.

According to Xinhua, China has an interest in helping resolve the conflict and the underlying issues involving the Palestinian population.

  • Joncash2
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are lots of photos of burnt out armor from the protestors attacks by western journalists.

    Their argument is if you see those images of destroyed armor taken by foreign nationals and still think that some how China did it, well fuck you. You’re too god damn stupid to talk to.

      • Joncash2
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What are you talking about, of course they were damaged with Chinese weaponry. They’re in China. I already told you at the time weapons weren’t as restricted, the people got access to Chinese weaponry. Why the fuck would Chinese protestors use other weaponry?

        *Edit: Did you know BLM protestors used AR-15s? Where was the non-American weaponry? No PROOF THEREFORE BLM DIDN’T HAPPEN. You absolute dunce.

        • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          For fucks sake dude, obviously I mean proper noun china, in contrast to the imaginary terrorists.

          Could you pick typing, or huffing glue? You get to do 1. Either turn off your computer, or go put the fucking glue away.

          • Joncash2
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Chinese people used Chinese weapons yes. Just like Americans user AR-15s. What is your point?

            • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              AR15s are not trademarked US weaponry. An AR15 is not proof of american military presence. Its just a gun.

              Do I need to dumb down questions for you? Should I avoid big boy words?

              • Joncash2
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                … Are you dumb? AR-15 is the civilian moniker for M-16. You know that right? There’s no way to distinguish the damage they do from one another.

                • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You genuinely have no idea what you were asked, and its so fucking funny.

                  Its like someone told me they trained their dog really well, so I tell the dog (you) to fetch a ball. And the dog (you) keeps trying to put its paw in my hand. No you dumb dog! Fetch!

                  Im not using complex ideas, Im speaking in simple sentences, Im repeating myself for you when you fuck up, and you still dont grok a thing.

                  “Hurrr, but AR? But AR? That merica weapon? Weapon, in merica? AR? It M16? Hurr? What was question?”

                  • Joncash2
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    There’s no way to distinguish the damage. It would be like comparing ar-15 with m-16. It’s impossible. And thus, you’ve proven why China simply says fuck you.