• AlexWIWA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the first time I’ve even heard of it, and I play strategy games mainly, so there’s its first problem.

  • Anonymousllama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tired of these half baked shithouse total war games like pharaoh, troy and britannia. It must be so hard to develop a sequel to medieval, Rome or any of the other successful franchises that people actually want to play

    • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are least Britannia was honest about being a saga game, Pharaoh is pretending that it is a mainline release.

  • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Apples to oranges comparison. CA builds a lot of games under the Total War banner. Some are very big, very expensive projects (like Rome 2), others are really just a way of testing tech and training devs (like Odysseus). Pharaoh, as I understand it, falls very much into the latter category.

    While the sales numbers look bad on the surface, for what it probably cost to make, I suspect CA is prefectly happy. Remember they literally gave Odysseus away for free. That’s just how their release cadence works.

    • trevwilson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      First of all, it’s called “A Total War Saga: Troy”, not Odysseus.

      More importantly, the “Saga” part of the title is what CA uses to designate the smaller, more experimental projects that you’re mentioning, which they explicitly did not use with Pharaoh.

    • clearleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think this one is being looked at differently because after hyenas people are wondering if the studio is dead or not