This is the first time I’ve even heard of it, and I play strategy games mainly, so there’s its first problem.
Yeh, I didn’t even know it had released
Same, I was about to say that I don’t even remember any TW games coming out in the last 10 years.
You can’t have missed Warhammer? That’s got to have been over the internet enough?
CA will do literally anything to avoid making Medieval 3.
Tired of these half baked shithouse total war games like pharaoh, troy and britannia. It must be so hard to develop a sequel to medieval, Rome or any of the other successful franchises that people actually want to play
Are least Britannia was honest about being a saga game, Pharaoh is pretending that it is a mainline release.
Apples to oranges comparison. CA builds a lot of games under the Total War banner. Some are very big, very expensive projects (like Rome 2), others are really just a way of testing tech and training devs (like Odysseus). Pharaoh, as I understand it, falls very much into the latter category.
While the sales numbers look bad on the surface, for what it probably cost to make, I suspect CA is prefectly happy. Remember they literally gave Odysseus away for free. That’s just how their release cadence works.
First of all, it’s called “A Total War Saga: Troy”, not Odysseus.
More importantly, the “Saga” part of the title is what CA uses to designate the smaller, more experimental projects that you’re mentioning, which they explicitly did not use with Pharaoh.
Sometimes uses. They wrote the rules, they can apply them however they like.
I think this one is being looked at differently because after hyenas people are wondering if the studio is dead or not
Maybe they should stop beating the dead horse and come up with something new
Let’s go, sale, let’s go
That thumbnail reminds me of the Californians.
Stuuarrt? Wu…wuduhhyoouudooneree?
