• Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Feels like your services there just makes http links with extra steps?

    Why would I want to use IPFS with those services instead of just online hosting?

    • rglullis@communick.newsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because you won’t be paying for distribution.

      If you are just hosting data for yourself, sure, go ahead and stick with a regular storage provider. IPFS is useful for the cases where there will be many people who will be accessing that data. The more popular a file is, the more nodes in the swarm will have it and the less it will be requested from your node specifically.

      • Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If I share data on an online hosting I also doesn’t pay more for distribution? Or is this for some special cases? I havent checked for a long time but I had over 800Mb/s in like 2010 at OVH and I don’t think it has gone exacty down …

              • Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Fair enough.

                So the IPFS network has a cap. Like OVH doesn’t have a cap as it’s a company, but their network does.

                • rglullis@communick.newsOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Are you trying to really understand how the thing works, or are you just looking for ways to dismiss the thing so that you can remain ignorant about it.

                  We’re talking about data transmission caps (as in, 1TB/month), not in bandwidth (as in 800MB/s) Also, IPFS is a protocol. The “cap” of the network is only theoretically bound by the amount of nodes running in it, but in practice it doesn’t really matter because the bandwidth of any single node will always end up being the real bottleneck.

                  • Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I’m not trying to dismiss this thing, but I see not very many usecases for it. That’s why I ask all those questions and the answers are not really fulfilling IMO.

                    BTW 800Mb/s is sure a cap too in its way, a 100MB/s is just that, capped on one second instead of a month.