• ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not that I love ICE cars or anything but isn’t the big health impact from heavy vehicles like delivery trucks and, more importantly, from the rubber particles caused by car tires? A problem that in general worsens with BEVs since they’re, on average, heavier? I’m sure smell will improve significantly, but breathing tire and road dust is the main health concern as I’ve understood it. Most other pollutants get rather effectively caught in the catalytic converter, aside from CO2 but that isn’t unhealthy per se. CO in small doses out doors also isn’t a big issue. NOx bad for nature but likely of low harm to humans. Etc. Someone please correct me if I’m misinformed.

    • Brainsploosh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are many issues with ICE cars, and it wouldn’t surprise if one of the main motivations behind the ban is to lessen dependence on fossil fuels.

      This is a fairly low risk step to see if deliveries and short range transport will switch into EV. It also lowers a lot of air pollution and noise, it looks suitably progressive and is easily reversible if shit goes wrong.

      • ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        For sure, good optics even though I argue that this basically means poorer people aren’t allowed to drive in the city only people rich enough to buy the right via a (relatively) expensive BEV. Sure the Renault Zoey exist and similar but on the whole BEVs are significantly more expensive.

        As for noise this might be true at the low speeds of the city center but keep in mind that on high ways BEVs make more noise than ICE vehicles due to the aforementioned increased mass, on average. High speeds it’s tyre friction and air friction which is the noise driver and not engine sounds.

        • Brainsploosh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Good thing this is for a dozen city blocks at the center of an organically grown city then.

          Walkable in about 15 minutes, and no highways.

          • GissaMittJobb
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            and no highways.

            Well, the E4 years through parts of the city like a sad scar in Essingeleden, so that’s not quite true.

            Unless you’re talking about the zone where ICE cars will be banned, in which case - yes indeed. I believe one of the exits of Klaratunneln is located inside the zone, but that’s not quite a highway, just highway-adjecent.

    • Person264@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think your concerns are valid, but on the whole electric vehicles have the potential to improve more than ICE vehicles https://www.rac.co.uk/drive/electric-cars/running/do-electric-vehicles-produce-more-tyre-and-brake-pollution-than-petrol-and/

      The extra mass of current EVs probably (note I don’t know for sure) doesn’t cancel out their other benefits, and as battery tech (and tyre tech I guess) improves they’ll get better.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Stockholm has announced plans to become the first big capital city to ban petrol and diesel cars from its centre, in an effort to slash pollution and reduce noise.

    From 2025, 20 blocks of Stockholm’s inner city area, spanning its finance and main shopping districts, will be restricted to electric vehicle traffic only.

    Announcing the plan, Lars Stromgren, the city’s vice-mayor for transport, said: “Nowadays, the air in Stockholm causes babies to have lung conditions and the elderly to die prematurely.

    Paris, Athens and Madrid have only banned diesel cars, and London has a charging scheme that covers the most polluting combustion engines.

    “Many cities have implemented low-emission zones where high-emission cars are allowed to drive if they pay a charge,” Stromgren was quoted as saying by Air Quality News.

    “We have chosen an area where large numbers of cyclists and pedestrians are exposed to unhealthy air on a daily basis.


    The original article contains 402 words, the summary contains 151 words. Saved 62%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Let’s maintain a good public transportation infrastructure so poor people and anyone else can move easily for much cheaper than having a car.

  • Ilovethebomb
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Given how limited the selection of electric vans and pickups is, I think this will backfire somewhat in terms of getting trades and technicians into the city centre.

    • Vub@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s just a few blocks in the city centre and it will make no difference really. Shitty clickbait, I hate the modern internet.

    • Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Sweden already has very good public transportation, bike infrastructure, and walkability. So there are plenty of other options. Nobody is going to become more poor over this.

      The pollution from fossil fuel cars is a non monetary cost. That cost should not be placed on the shoulders of others.

    • frank@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      As the other commenter said, there is a lot less dependence in Stockholm on cars than most places. Sweden has extremely low poverty rates anyway, and has pretty.good systems in place for the poor

  • dunestorm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Great idea in an ideal world, in reality it won’t work. Not everyone can afford electric vehicles, charging points are still scarse, charge times are longer than refuelling oil.

    We need to work those problems out before they genuinely become a viable option.

    • Hyperreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      American, right? Perfectly feasible with good public transport in a dense European cities like Stockholm. It’s not a particularly large area either. Sidewalks and cycle paths everywhere.

      If you read the article, you’ll also read that exceptions will be made for the disabled, large (hybrid) vans, emergency services, etc.

      TBH plenty of European cities, taking your car into the city centre is for rich people anyway. Parking can easily costs you 50 euros per day or more.

      Meanwhile, you can often park for free (or next to free) at a so called park and ride at the edge of the city, then hop on public transport to the centre for 5-10 minutes and avoid congestion almost entirely.

      • dunestorm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not even American, I’m from the UK. I’m all for going green but I am also being a realist.