Striker@lemmy.worldM to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agoAmazon Anti Union propagandalemmy.worldimagemessage-square156fedilinkarrow-up11.79Karrow-down131cross-posted to: antiwork@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.75Karrow-down1imageAmazon Anti Union propagandalemmy.worldStriker@lemmy.worldM to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square156fedilinkcross-posted to: antiwork@lemmy.world
minus-squareNot_Alec_Baldwin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28arrow-down1·1 year agoThat’s because the manager is incentivized to not help you, while the union is incentivized to help you. Unions are game-theoretically necessary.
minus-squareNatanael@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoIf employers have organizations advocating for them, it only makes sense for employees to have the same
That’s because the manager is incentivized to not help you, while the union is incentivized to help you.
Unions are game-theoretically necessary.
If employers have organizations advocating for them, it only makes sense for employees to have the same