10-4

    • makingStuffForFun
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Only for file storage organisation. But I’ll agree on that use case only.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        IMO it’s actually the best for everything. dd/mm/yyyy is ambiguous due to the American date format existing.

        • makingStuffForFun
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          What does American date formatting have to do with anything / anyone outside of America?

          DMY is the perfect progression. 2nd of the 3rd, 23. Perfect sense logically speaking.

          • dan@upvote.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            What does American date formatting have to do with anything / anyone outside of America?

            If you see a date somewhere, you can’t ever be 100% sure that it’s dd/mm/yyyy, as an American may have written it. On the other hand, yyyy-mm-dd is unambiguous.

            DMY is the perfect progression.

            That’s not the case when written with a time next to it, because in that case it’s inconsistent and “backwards” compared to the time. The date goes from “smallest” unit (day) to largest unit (year), yet time is written the opposite way, with the largest unit (hour) to the smallest unit (seconds or milliseconds). If you instead do yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss, the entire thing is in a consistent order.

    • Fogle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah ymd is better than any alternative by a tenfold