• Steeve@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Does it swap search terms just for the portion that returns the ad or for the search as well? If it’s just the ad, that doesn’t seem very problematic, just an implementation detail on how it chooses which ad to show. If it’s for the search as well, I don’t see how that would benefit Google. They wouldn’t be able to consider a search result click a successful conversion if it wasn’t an actual advertisement.

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I read about this in a blog post on Wired, written by someone who was there (former executive of DuckDuckGo). He also mentioned how they may benefit from having results that aren’t quite accurate, as then you spend more time searching, which means more time to serve you ads. There is an inherent conflict of interest between adverts and fast search engines.

      • Steeve@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Paywalled! Fuckin Wired.

        He also mentioned how they may benefit from having results that aren’t quite accurate, as then you spend more time searching, which means more time to serve you ads.

        That’s an interesting one, give up a bit of user experience for increased ad impressions. Pretty clever, but breaks all kinds of anti-competition laws if true.

        • juched@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I find it really ironic that ads and a paywall are being complained about in the same thread

          • Steeve@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Different users lol. I think I’m one of the few Lemmy users that doesn’t care about ads…