Title is somewhat misleading. It’s not for anything video-related. It’s for using a (probably free) photo of actress Cuca Escribano without permission.

  • HughJanus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well it sounds like they took it down immediately so it was “resolved” but I guess that doesn’t undo the lost revenue.

    • LufyCZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      From what I know, if they complied immediately, the plaintiff doesn’t really have a case