• PeachMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would bet they’re basically losing money on the $399 model, but making money on the higher spec models. No other manufacturer has been able to offer similar performance at that low price point (yet).

    • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyzM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cost analysis estimates I’ve seen have them also taking a small loss on 256GB units, only making a profit on 512GB units.

      They didn’t have official data though, they were mostly working backwards from taking the ifixit part costs and assuming ifixit used their standard markup.

      • PeachMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Makes sense, Gabe said in an interview that making that $399 price point was “painful”. But I guess the point is that the Deck sales drive Steam game sales.

      • HughJanus
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        they were mostly working backwards from taking the ifixit part costs and assuming ifixit used their standard markup.

        I mean that’s pure BoM and doesn’t include costs of development or assembly.

    • Clusterfck@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I would bet that they aren’t losing as much money as other companies would. Valve made their own OS for the Steam Deck. Asus and Lenovo made similar devices, but they both run Windows and have to pay Microsoft licensing fees.

      It’ll be really interesting if Valve opens up a partner program with other OEMs to allow things like firmware updates through SteamOS on more devices than just the Deck. I think then, we’d see $500 or less competing consoles to the Deck.

        • HughJanus
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          One could make the case that SteamOS is actually a massive cost because they had to mostly develop it themselves. Not to mention Proton.

          But then those other OEMs make their own GUIs also.

          Not sure which one cost more…