• aelwero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This apparently is an objectionable point to bring up… not sure if your downvotes are the “all or nothing” aspect, or the spotlighting of the blatant racist aspect, but it seems people don’t want to see this at face value :/

    I’m with you though. The selective targeting is wrong. Equal ban or no ban is the right position to take IMHO.

    • Anticorp
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I down voted it because I don’t think the government should ban substances. Not cigarettes, not alcohol, not marijuana, not psychedelics, and probably not a bunch of other drugs too. The government’s job is not to play mommy and daddy for a nation of adults. Our citizens are entirely too eager to strip away their own liberty these days.

      • aelwero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree with that.

        The specific ban in question on this particular post isn’t a general matter though… it’s targeting minorities…

        That kinda makes it a moot point in my opinion on wether or not prohibition is appropriate in general, because regardless of where you fall on the matter of bans or liberties, the specificity of the intended targets is wildly inappropriate, because it’s racist/homophobic, so I kinda disregarded the last point they made entirely :)