• IzzyData
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Paying to remove ads is still paying them for implementing ads.

      • IzzyData
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Ads are not the only way to monetize something. There are a few options which I would find agreeable. The first one would be selling it. You pay for access. There is no version in which has ads and the only way to use it is to pay for it. Another method would be to sell more advanced features or some form of usability. Maybe you can only view 1000 videos a month for free, but have to pay for more.

        Whatever the method may be, ads are not the only way and unfortunately paying to remove ads just causes more ads to be implemented in things because you are rewarding them for doing it.

        • nave@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Paying to remove ads and paying for access are essentially the same thing right? They have to monetize it in some way. Ads are going to implemented whether people pay or not. At least now you have a choice whether you pay with your data or money.

          • IzzyData
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            They aren’t the same thing. With ads the monetization strategy is to implement ads to annoy the user into paying. Then finally paying for it is letting them know that they succeeded in implementing ads in a way that got you to give them money. You are thus incentivizing an ad driven internet.

            Paying for access is paying for the service because you think it is good enough to spend money on. This is incentivizing the development of a good service.

            Data harvesting another matter entirely. TikTok is going to harvest the data of paying customers and free customers regardless.

            • nave@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              With ads the monetization strategy is to implement ads to annoy the user into paying

              The thing is, the vast majority of websites exclusively have an ad tier and the vast majority of internet users will tolerate any amount of ads because they’re not going to pay for these services.

              Paying for access is paying for the service because you think it is good enough to spend money on.

              if I pay for a subscription to TikTok then I obviously think that it is good enough to spend money on. And it’s not like there’s any guarantee paying is going to improve a service. Netflix started off with no ads and look where it’s at. You have to pay for ads and they keep increasing subscription costs.

  • Polar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Obviously. I predicted this on Mastodon months ago when they started adding ads right in the middle of videos.

    Piss people off and they’ll pay to disable ads. There’s nothing that competes with TikTok right now.

    • Schal330@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Charge people to go ad-free. Keep increasing the sub price over time, then provide a lower cost version with minimal ads.

      • Polar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        Tiktok and YouTube are my only sources of entertainment. I’m okay paying for both.

        Especially since both allow for anyone to upload as much as they want without limits or fees. Hosting that much data isn’t cheap.

        Obviously the FOSS users will downvote me, as they believe everything should be free and unlimited.

        • bug@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          This is the most defeatist attitude I’ve ever seen

          • Polar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            And Lemmy users think everything should be free, without ads, like bandwidth and storage are free.

            But I’m glad being fine with paying for my entertainment is defeatist. Go back to your torrents, poor boy.

            • zeroxxx@lemmy.my.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Agreed. Some people have this moronic attitude that everything comes for free.

            • bug@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Go back to your torrents, poor boy.

              Lol, I thought we were going to have a serious discussion about the relative merits of advertising vs community servers with donations, turns out you’re just an elitist cunt. Probably my mistake for not seeing the “TikTok and YouTube are my only sources of entertainment” red flag!

              • Polar@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                How is it a red flag to view content on two of the biggest websites?

                You’re a 🤡

                • bug@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  The fact that they’re your whole life is the problem. You’ll understand when you grow up.