• Lvxferre
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I disagree because sometimes you need to go against people too, not just the ideas. For example, if you protest against a politician trying to approve a law that fucks everyone for the benefit of his personal business, you are “punching” him metaphorically. If you bring the authorities against someone powerful for breaking the law, you’re also “punching” the person. So goes on.

    On the other hand, someone gave a great example, about someone poor stealing baby food. Calling the cops against the person would be to punch down.

    • Critical_Insight@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      if you protest against a politician trying to approve a law that fucks everyone for the benefit of his personal business

      Even in this case, going after them as a person, instead of protesting against the law itself seems counter-productive. If I make an argument and someone then calls me stupid, it’s not going to change my mind, nor anyone else’s who agrees with me. It’s just makes it sound like they simply don’t have a better argument. It’s maybe a bit different when the personality flaw in itself is the issue, as is the case with Trump and lying for example, but if one then starts making fun on his small hands that just makes them look petty.

      However, I still want to aknowledge, that humans are social animals and such public ridicule has been a powerful weapon throught the ages, so even though I personally don’t want to act in this way, and in my ideal world no one else would either, it is still possible, if not even likely, that such ridicule is very effective. Then again, shooting them is effective aswell, but I don’t want to live in a world where we solve disagreements that way.