• Treeniks
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The way UTF-8 works is fixed though, isn’t it? A new Unicode standard should not change that, so as long as the string is UTF-8 encoded, you can determine the character count without needing to have the latest Unicode standard.

    Plus in Rust, you can instead use .chars().count() as Rust’s char type is UTF-8 Unicode encoded, thus strings are as well.

    turns out one should read the article before commenting

    • Knusper@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      No offense, but did you read the article?

      You should at least read the section “Wouldn’t UTF-32 be easier for everything?” and the following two sections for the context here.

      So, everything you’ve said is correct, but it’s irrelevant for the grapheme count.
      And you should pretty much never need to know the number of codepoints.

      • Treeniks
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        yup, my bad. Frankly I thought grapheme meant something else, rather stupid of me. I think I understand the issue now and agree with you.

        • Knusper@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          No worries, I almost commented here without reading the article, too, and did not really know what graphemes are beforehand either. 🫠