The Oregon Court of Appeals has formally asked the state’s highest court to decide whether Republican state senators who carried out a record-setting GOP walkout this year can run for
That’s not a personal attack. It’s an actual question as if you think the only source of rights is in the constitution then you are very poorly educated.
To be clear part of your confusion seems to be what words like “extra”, “equal” and “additional” mean so suggestions that you aren’t well informed are not coming from nowhere.
I am not confused; the current court agrees with me. I get you are arguing from ignorance, but leave me out of your confusion. Thomas would like to review all the cases, and he thinks they are flawed. I agree. Most of these need to be overturned.
Stomping your foot and throwing insults is your way of trying to communicate, but it’s tiresome to adults. Go pout somewhere else.
I understand the law well and agree with the decisions’ fundamental issues. Now I don’t disagree with the outcomes but we don’t decide the outcome and then try to justify it. You let the facts lead you to the outcome.
No my argument is solid. Thanks for your opinion though. As I cited the courts will be reviewing the cases which further shows you have are incorrect.
You’ll stomp your foot when the rulings are overturned but you’ll lack the ability to understand why. It’s the same thing when roe was overturned. People like you didn’t understand even when the court clearly explained it.
While I support gay marriage and abortion, the courts are not the ones to decide that. You’ll stomp your foot and throw a hissy fit but it’s the way our country should run. Congress needs to step up and do their job
Are you so poorly educated that you think the constitution is the only source of rights?
I don’t think you have an understanding of the law at all based on the ignorance you display here
Thanks for the personal attack. as it shows you don’t grasp what I said at all.
That’s not a personal attack. It’s an actual question as if you think the only source of rights is in the constitution then you are very poorly educated.
To be clear part of your confusion seems to be what words like “extra”, “equal” and “additional” mean so suggestions that you aren’t well informed are not coming from nowhere.
deleted by creator
I am not confused; the current court agrees with me. I get you are arguing from ignorance, but leave me out of your confusion. Thomas would like to review all the cases, and he thinks they are flawed. I agree. Most of these need to be overturned.
Stomping your foot and throwing insults is your way of trying to communicate, but it’s tiresome to adults. Go pout somewhere else.
I understand the law well and agree with the decisions’ fundamental issues. Now I don’t disagree with the outcomes but we don’t decide the outcome and then try to justify it. You let the facts lead you to the outcome.
https://nypost.com/2022/06/24/court-should-reconsider-gay-marriage-birth-control-clarence-thomas/
You are confused what they mean because your argument makes no sense if you understand the common definition for those words.
The rest of your post is immaterial to the argument here because you factually have displayed no understanding of commonly used terms.
No my argument is solid. Thanks for your opinion though. As I cited the courts will be reviewing the cases which further shows you have are incorrect.
You’ll stomp your foot when the rulings are overturned but you’ll lack the ability to understand why. It’s the same thing when roe was overturned. People like you didn’t understand even when the court clearly explained it.
While I support gay marriage and abortion, the courts are not the ones to decide that. You’ll stomp your foot and throw a hissy fit but it’s the way our country should run. Congress needs to step up and do their job