WASHINGTON (AP) — It’s hard to imagine a less contentious or more innocent word than “and.”
But how to interpret that simple conjunction has prompted a complicated legal fight that lands in the Supreme Court on Oct. 2, the first day of its new term. What the justices decide could affect thousands of prison sentences each year.
Federal courts across the country disagree about whether the word, as it is used in a bipartisan 2018 criminal justice overhaul, indeed means “and” or whether it means “or.” Even an appellate panel that upheld a longer sentence called the structure of the provision “perplexing.”
The Supreme Court has stepped in to settle the dispute.
It was written in 2018, not 1818. Just ask the people who wrote it. Sheesh!
A decision in Pulsifer v. U.S., 22-340, is expected by spring.
Whoa now! Let’s not allow the wheels of justice to speed along here!