• zepheriths@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    1 year ago

    The problem with what happened in 2005 is that the director pressured them into revealing themselves. Although I am confused as to how this was found out in the first place

      • Snowclone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        She want taught an existing form of sign language, she was taught a never explained version of signing, which only the people who worked with her knew, and this was never documented in any scientific way for peer review, and the results weren’t reproducable with other gorilla’s or other researchers.

        Best case scenarios, the humans involved anthropomorphized the gorilla, and thought they were communicating on a level much higher than they were actually communicating on, do to this.

        Worst case, there were lying knowingly, and this was some sort of scam for money.

    • takeda@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Although I am confused as to how this was found out in the first place

      The affected people sued the organizion?

        • Snowclone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Most information points to it all being fraudulent, so, the ‘interpretor’ was either dealing with a lot of repressed sexually, or they were using the guise of a talking gorilla to sexually exploit workers. Which, that’s gotta be the first time that’s happened, right?