horrible

  • sovietknuckles [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This legislation would require a court, when determining the best interests of a child in a child custody or visitation proceeding, to consider, among other comprehensive factors, a parent’s affirmation of the child’s gender identity or gender expression.

    Never mind all the other legislation in other states and nationally that has been used to restrict trans rights that has passed, Newsom is sure that courts will strike down all of those eventually.

    A visual of his logic:

      Court Legislation
    Can provide human rights
    Can restrict human rights

    And if they don’t override his veto, he’s effectively correct, in California at least