I’ve generally been against giving AI works copyright, but this article presented what I felt were compelling arguments for why I might be wrong. What do you think?

  • Beej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    As an author, I say cut the term waaay down. 12 years plus the option for a 12-year one-time renewal.

    Some will get screwed, but the entire populace will gain.

    • frog 🐸@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d been thinking recently that cutting the copyright term down to 20 years would be reasonable. So while 12 years feels a bit low to me, the optional 12 year renewal (taking it to 24 years in total) works just fine. You have my vote.