thehatfox@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoOpinion: The Copyright Office is making a mistake on AI-generated artarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up149arrow-down126cross-posted to: aicopyright@lemm.eetechnology@beehaw.orgai_@lemmy.world
arrow-up123arrow-down1external-linkOpinion: The Copyright Office is making a mistake on AI-generated artarstechnica.comthehatfox@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square42fedilinkcross-posted to: aicopyright@lemm.eetechnology@beehaw.orgai_@lemmy.world
minus-squaremagnetosphere@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·1 year agoI’m glad I read this article. I started out thinking that AI generated work didn’t deserve a copyright, but the comparison with early photography changed my mind. Artists have much more influence on AI generated images than I gave them credit for.
I’m glad I read this article. I started out thinking that AI generated work didn’t deserve a copyright, but the comparison with early photography changed my mind. Artists have much more influence on AI generated images than I gave them credit for.