• lily33@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Since I don’t think this analogy works, you shouldn’t stop there, but actually explain how the world would look like if everyone had access to AI technology (advanced enough to be comparable to a nuke), vs how it would look like if only a small elite had access to it.

    • photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Okay, well, if everyone had access to an AGI, anyone could design and distribute a pathogen that could wipe out a significant portion of the population. Then again, you’d have the collective force of everyone else’s AI countering that plot.

      I think that putting that kind of power into the hands of everyone shouldnt be done lightly.

      • Hanabie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are papers online on how to design viruses. Now to get funding for a lab and staff, because this is nothing like Breaking Bad.

      • Rayspekt@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        You still can’t manufacture it. Your comparision with nukes is actually a good example: The basic knowledge how a nuke works is out there, yet most people struggle in refining weapon-grade plutonium.

        Knowledge is only one part in doing something.

      • lily33@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would say the risk of having AI be limited to the ruling elite is worse, though - because there wouldn’t be everyone else’s AI to counter them.

        And if AI is limited to a few, those few WILL become the new ruling elite.

        • Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          And people would be less likely to identify what AI can and can’t do if we convince ourselves to limit our access to it.

          • subignition@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            People are already incompetent enough at this when there’s a disclaimer in front of their faces warning about gpt.

            We’re seeing responses even in this thread conflating AGI with LLMs. People at large are too fucking stupid to be trusted with this kind of thing

      • serratur@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re just gonna print the pathogens with the pathogen printer? You understand that getting the information doesn’t mean you’re able to produce it.

        • Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I need an article on how a 3d printer can be used to print an underground chemistry lab to produce these weapons grade pathogens

          • testfactor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I know how to build a barn. Doesn’t mean I can do it by myself with no tools or materials.

            Turns out that building and operating a lab that can churn out bespoke pathogens is actually even more difficult and expensive than that.

      • Kichae@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Let’s assume your hypothetical here isnt bonkers: How, exactly, do you propose limiting people’s access to linear algebra?

    • Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We could all do our taxes for free. Fix grammatical errors. Have a pocket legal, medical advice. A niche hobby advisor. Pocket professor. A form completion tool. All in one assistant especially for people who might not know how to navigate a lot of tasks in life. Or we could ban it because I fear maybe someone will use it to make memes. Lots of lazy articles convinced me the AI sky is falling